- Show more sharing options
Share
- Copy Link URLCopied!
It is infuriating as well as alarming that the U.S. Senate on Wednesday failed to pass the Right to Contraception Act, a straightforward bill that would guarantee a federal right to safe and legal contraception.
For the record:
10:25 p.m. June 8, 2024A previous version of this editorial misstated the number of votes the Right to Contraception Act received in the Senate. It received 51.
The bill needed 60 votes to proceed but only received 51, all but two coming from Democrats and independents who caucus with Democrats. Senate Majority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.), a staunch supporter of the bill, changed his vote to a “no” so as to allow him to bring up the bill again.
Americans should be appalled that nearly half of the people elected to represent them in the Senate are so spineless they couldn’t vote for something as simple as a right to contraception, which 90% of women have used at one point in their lives and is considered basic preventive healthcare.
Opinion
Editorial: A right to IVF or abortion will never be protected if fetuses and embryos are declared people
An Alabama court decision brought national attention to the creeping personhood movement that seeks to extend legal protection to fetuses and embryos.
March 4, 2024
Only two Republicans, Sens. Susan Collins (R-Maine) and Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) voted for it. Good for them. Their Republican colleagues, on the other hand, blustered variously about the bill being a political move, too broad or unnecessary.
Advertisem*nt
That’s ridiculous. There’s clearly a movement among antiabortion activists to wrongly redefine contraceptives as abortifacients. And any of their constituents should think long and hard about voting for a senator who won’t support their right to contraception. If it were enshrined into federal law, states couldn’t override it with restrictions. If the Supreme Court struck down its own precedents protecting the right to contraception, the federal law would still protect it.
Opinion
Abcarian: Hang on to the pill and your IUD. After abortion, birth control is the next fight
The forces fighting against legal abortion have already shown their hand: Contraception is the next target.
April 12, 2023
And that is not out of the question. The Supreme Court has voted three times to support the right to contraception over the decades, but does anyone want to bet on the justices upholding this precedent? The court also guaranteed a right to abortion in Roe vs. Wade — and upheld it in a subsequent case — before overturning it in the Dobbs decision two years ago.
Ominously, that abortion decision also contained a concurrence written by Justice Clarence Thomas that suggested the court revisit the landmark 1965 decision in Griswold vs. Connecticut, which granted married couples the right to birth control. So there are plenty of reasons to fear that the Supreme Court could withdraw its support for birth control.
California
The first over-the-counter birth control pill becomes available. Where is it sold?
Health experts say the over-the-counter birth control pill gives contraception options to people who live in rural or remote areas.
March 19, 2024
The Senate contraception bill does not force anyone to provide contraception. It allows women to access it and healthcare professionals to provide it. Nor is this bill a slippery slope to condoning abortion, as opponents claim.
Contraceptives are not abortifacients. “The medical definition of pregnancy is an embryo implanted in the wall of the uterus,” says Daniel Grossman, a professor in the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences at UC San Francisco. “No contraceptives end an established pregnancy — they prevent pregnancy from occurring.”
So why would Senate Republicans block a bill supporting a right to contraception? Aren’t these the same people who, for the most part, don’t want women having abortions? How do they think reproduction works? Or is this about taking away the rights of women to control their own bodies to curry favor with far-right antiabortion groups who have problems with contraception as well?
Advertisem*nt
We should all work to make sure lawmakers who don’t support the right to control your own body don’t get reelected.
More to Read
-
Column: Ted Cruz and Katie Britt claim to be protecting IVF with a new bill. Don’t believe them
June 5, 2024
-
News Analysis: Supreme Court has right and far-right wings. Their justices might not be those you’d guess
March 29, 2024
-
Calmes: The Supreme Court tackles abortion again. How much will it hurt Republicans in 2024?
March 24, 2024
More to Read
-
Column: Ted Cruz and Katie Britt claim to be protecting IVF with a new bill. Don’t believe them
June 5, 2024
-
News Analysis: Supreme Court has right and far-right wings. Their justices might not be those you’d guess
March 29, 2024
-
Calmes: The Supreme Court tackles abortion again. How much will it hurt Republicans in 2024?
March 24, 2024
More to Read
-
Column: Ted Cruz and Katie Britt claim to be protecting IVF with a new bill. Don’t believe them
June 5, 2024
-
Politics
News Analysis: Supreme Court has right and far-right wings. Their justices might not be those you’d guess
March 29, 2024
-
Opinion
Calmes: The Supreme Court tackles abortion again. How much will it hurt Republicans in 2024?
March 24, 2024
-
Opinion
Editorial: A right to IVF or abortion will never be protected if fetuses and embryos are declared people
March 4, 2024
-
Opinion
Opinion: Why Trump’s Christian base will bet on him even if he goes wobbly on abortion
Nov. 19, 2023
-
Letters to the Editor
Letters to the Editor: Would a national abortion ban even be possible in the U.S.?
Nov. 10, 2023
-
California
Column: Why Ohio’s abortion vote should scare California
Nov. 8, 2023
-
Opinion
Editorial: Thanks to Ohio, people who value reproductive rights have another victory
Nov. 8, 2023
-
Opinion
Editorial: When will Republicans get the message that people want their abortion rights?
Aug. 10, 2023